This really bugs me, as it turns out, because I remember that - back in the 90s - there was a massive global drive to change to Ozone-friendly fridges and what not. I remember coming home from school, after learning about the depleted Ozone (especially over Southern Africa where I was located), and telling my mum we have to change fridges.
Now, after more than a decade of replacements, we've just been told by those same so-called experts that: "HFCs are many more times potent than CO2, could account for up to 20% of emissions and hamper efforts to curb climate change," and we need to, once again, start to introduce new standards through: "updating global standards, investment incentives and technical training programmes."
Unbelievable. Now, there will be yet another drive to change from HFCs to something else, a replacement that doesn't seem to be indicated in the report in detail. However, they did point out three areas to change:
- Alter building designs to limit the use of air-conditioning - can you possibly imagine the cost this will mean for the world? And, let's not forget the vicious circle of big city-crowding-heat generated-need cooling to survive...
- Increase the use of non-HFC substances - still meaning a heck of a lot of costs involved to cover the short-sightedness of these "experts".
- Use of "climate-friendly-HFCs" - I'm sorry, but how many "blah blah-friendly whatevers" have we been told to use or change to with the result being more disastrous that before, like this example?
Still, the Ozone is a very important fabric of our existence on this aforementioned planet. We do need to protect it. But, I wonder, how many times will we end up causing more damage to it, or to another aspect of our planet, before we can finally arrive at a point where we no longer impose ourselves on Mother Nature? A more detailed, and long-term vision, should be the starting point without any doubt!
Image source: NASA via Wikipedia
No comments:
Post a Comment